Non-GamStop Curacao Casino Sites: What to Check

→

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in GB

Fast payouts

18+ Only

Content

• What “Best” Means When You Cannot Verify the Offers
• GamStop’s Reach—and Where Its Boundary Lies
• What a Curacao Licence Does—and Does Not—Tell You
• Checking a Casino Licence Without Assuming It Is Verified
• Safety Signals and Payment Rules to Check
• Not on GamStop: What Self-Exclusion Actually Covers
• Neteller and Skrill: Check the Rules Before You Deposit
• Crypto Casinos: Treat Availability as Unverified
• New Curacao Casinos: No Verified Launches to List
• How to Self-Exclude—and What Happens Next

A cautious framework for checking licensing claims, payment conditions and self-exclusion limits without treating unknowns as verified facts.

What “Best” Means When You Cannot Verify the Offers

“Best” only means something when you can say what was measured. One casino might appear preferable for a player who values clear account controls; another might suit someone comparing payment conditions. Without comparable, checked information about individual operators, neither preference supports a reliable winner. A list of supposed best Curacao casinos would imply that each entry had been assessed on the same evidence. A confident label cannot do that work.

Use a comparison table, but keep the columns tied to things you can inspect. For each casino you are considering, record what its own terms and account pages actually say, and mark unanswered points as unknown rather than filling them with assumptions.

This is a way to organise your checks, not a certification system. A filled-in table does not prove that a casino is safe, that its claims are accurate, or that it is suitable for you. It helps reveal where two offers genuinely differ and where the comparison stops because an answer cannot be established.

Treat licensing as a threshold question, not a decorative score. Read the operator’s stated details carefully and distinguish a claim on a website from a status you have independently confirmed. Do not award points simply because a page displays a badge or uses reassuring language. If you cannot establish what the claim means, record it as unresolved. The separate question of what a Curacao licence does or does not establish for a UK player needs particular care; it cannot be settled by a ranking label.

Payment terms also need to be compared as written, not as advertised in a headline. Note which methods the operator says it accepts, the conditions attached to deposits and withdrawals, and whether the terms explain how a payment is handled. If details are unclear or vary across pages, that uncertainty matters. Do not infer that a method is available from a search result, an old review, or another casino’s payment page. Availability at one operator would not establish availability at another.

Non-GamStop European Casinos: UK Player Guide

Responsible-gambling controls deserve their own column rather than a vague “safety” rating. Check whether the casino explains how to use its account safeguards and how to ask for help. A polished page is not the same thing as an effective control, so avoid treating design or marketing claims as proof. Self-exclusion is a formal commitment not to gamble; sticking to that commitment remains the player’s responsibility. Gambling businesses also have to take reasonable measures to stop excluded customers from gambling with them. Those principles matter more than a promotional badge.

Your priorities determine how to weigh the columns. If clear terms matter most, an operator with easy-to-find rules may compare better for you than one whose presentation is slicker. If you need a particular payment method, a casino that does not clearly confirm it cannot be called the better choice on that criterion. If you are maintaining self-exclusion, do not treat access to a non-GamStop casino as a way around it: gambling there could conflict with the commitment you made. Do not open an account elsewhere to get around an exclusion.

A useful comparison therefore has three outcomes, not just a winner: a stronger fit on a named criterion, a weaker fit, or not enough information to judge. That last result is not a minor footnote. It prevents a missing answer from quietly becoming a favourable assumption. “Best online casino Curacao” is not a single measurable category unless the comparison states what matters and shows how each operator performs against it.

Do

• Record what terms and account pages actually say
• Mark unanswered points as unknown
• Treat licensing as a threshold question
• Compare payment terms as written

Don’t

• Fill missing information with assumptions
• Award points for badges or reassuring language
• Infer method availability from search results
• Treat design or marketing claims as proof

The same discipline applies to claims about the best Curacao casinos in 2026. A date in a heading does not make old or unconfirmed details current, and a ranking does not turn claims into verification. For each candidate, keep a note of what you checked and when; revisit details before acting, because terms and account information can change. If a key point cannot be established, leave that casino unranked rather than awarding it an imaginary advantage.

There is no best-for-everyone verdict here. The useful result is a comparison you can explain: which operator appears to fit a stated need, on which checkable criterion, and where uncertainty remains. Anything more sweeping would be a guess dressed as a table.

GamStop’s Reach—and Where Its Boundary Lies

GamStop is the national online self-exclusion scheme for Great Britain. Its purpose is to apply a single self-exclusion request across participating online gambling operators, rather than leaving you to contact each participating casino separately. The scheme covers online gambling websites and apps, including UK-licensed online casinos that take part.

That reach is broad within its defined network, but it is not a universal block on every gambling service a person might encounter online. The key distinction is between a participating site or app and one that sits outside the scheme. GamStop operates across the first group; its coverage should not be mistaken for a filter that controls access to every casino on the internet.

Online Casino with No Sister Sites in the UK: What to Check

What the scheme connects

For a player who chooses to self-exclude through GamStop, the central benefit is multi-operator coverage. One scheme is intended to block access across participating licensed online gambling websites and apps. This differs from asking an individual gambling business to exclude you only from its own service: GamStop’s scope is the participating network, not just one account or brand.

The word “participating” matters. It describes the boundary of the scheme, not a promise that every website using casino language, every app, or every operator worldwide is connected to it. A site’s appearance in an online discussion, or its description as a casino for British players, does not by itself establish that GamStop applies there.

For practical purposes, think of GamStop as a network-based safeguard. Within that network, a self-exclusion request is meant to apply across participating services. Outside it, the scheme does not itself provide that same cross-operator block. The boundary is about coverage, not about whether a particular website is safe, suitable, or lawful.

The Great Britain scope

GamStop is described as the national scheme for Great Britain. That geographical description is important: it should not be casually expanded to mean every part of the United Kingdom. Its role is also specific to online gambling, through participating websites and apps. It is not a blanket exclusion from every form of gambling, nor does its name mean that all gambling businesses or all online services are automatically connected.

GamStop is a network-based safeguard intended to block access across participating licensed online gambling websites and apps in Great Britain.

The scheme is therefore most useful to understand as a common route for self-exclusion from participating UK-licensed online casinos and other participating online gambling operators. UK-licensed online casinos are among the services players can choose to exclude from through GamStop. The scheme’s multi-operator design gives that choice wider reach than a request made to one business alone.

There is a difference between the scheme’s reach and the wider question of what rules apply to an operator. GamStop tells you about participation in a self-exclusion network; it is not, by itself, a complete description of a casino’s legal status or operating arrangements. Those are separate questions. A neat label cannot do all that work.

What “not on GamStop” tells you

When a casino is described as “not on GamStop”, the phrase indicates that the scheme’s network block does not cover that service. It does not establish why the service is outside the network, what protections it provides, or whether it is appropriate for a particular player. Those conclusions cannot be drawn from the label alone.

That distinction matters when people look for non-GamStop Curacao casinos or compare Curacao casino sites not on GamStop. The wording joins two separate ideas: a claimed connection to Curaçao and absence from GamStop’s participating network. Neither phrase, on its own, confirms the details of a particular casino. It also does not turn the scheme into a global directory or verification service.

If you have chosen self-exclusion because gambling is causing harm, a service outside GamStop should not be treated as a substitute route back to gambling. GamStop’s boundary explains what the scheme covers; it does not make an uncovered site a suitable alternative. The existence of a gap in a network is not a recommendation to step through it.

Non-GamStop Casinos UK: Gamban Blocks Explained

A useful way to read the boundary

When considering any online gambling service, separate three questions: whether it participates in GamStop, whether it is within the scheme’s Great Britain online scope, and what other rules or safeguards apply to it. The first question is about the self-exclusion network. It cannot answer the others by implication.

For a participating licensed website or app, GamStop provides multi-operator coverage. For a service outside that network, GamStop cannot supply the same block through its scheme. That is the clear limit. The scheme remains meaningful precisely because its scope can be stated without pretending it covers every online casino a person might find.

What a Curacao Licence Does—and Does Not—Tell You

A casino’s stated Curacao licence and its relationship with GamStop are separate questions. One concerns the operator’s claimed regulatory status; the other concerns whether a player’s self-exclusion applies at that business. A licence claim alone does not answer both.

For people in Great Britain, the relevant requirement is clear: remote gambling operators selling into the British market must hold the appropriate licence from the UK Gambling Commission, wherever the operator is based. A licence issued elsewhere does not replace that requirement. Online gambling is legal in the UK only through licensed and regulated sites.

That distinction matters when a site describes itself as a Curacao-licensed online casino. The description may refer to a licence the operator claims to hold, but it does not establish that the operator is authorised to serve British customers. Nor does the wording, by itself, show whether the casino is covered by GamStop. Those are not interchangeable credentials.

Legal Requirement

Remote gambling operators selling into the British market must hold the appropriate licence from the UK Gambling Commission, regardless of where the operator is based.

Licensing and GamStop are different tests

GamStop is a multi-operator self-exclusion scheme for online gambling. From 31 March 2020, participation became compulsory for online operators under the UK Gambling Commission’s requirements. As a result, UK-licensed online casinos are required to block customers who have self-excluded through the scheme.

This gives you a practical distinction. UKGC licensing concerns whether an operator is authorised to offer remote gambling to the British market. GamStop participation concerns whether the operator must apply the scheme’s self-exclusion block. For UK-licensed online operators, the two are connected by the regulatory requirement to participate. A foreign licence claim does not create that same connection.

So, the phrase “not registered with GamStop” should not be treated as proof that a site is exempt from British requirements. It is a description of the site’s apparent relationship with the scheme, not evidence that the operator is permitted to offer gambling to people in Great Britain. Likewise, a Curacao licence claim does not establish that the casino is outside the reach of UK rules simply because its stated licensing jurisdiction is elsewhere.

The deciding criterion for a British player is not which licence sounds more familiar or appears on a site’s branding. It is whether the operator holds the UK Gambling Commission licence required to serve this market. The stated location of a licence and the operator’s legal position in Britain are different matters.

What a foreign licence claim cannot establish

A reference to Curacao may tell you what regulatory status a casino says it has. On its own, it cannot confirm that the casino holds a current UK Gambling Commission licence, that it is authorised to accept British customers, or that it participates in GamStop. Those conclusions require separate evidence; they do not follow from the phrase “Curacao licensed”.

The reverse also matters: a casino’s apparent absence from GamStop does not prove that it holds a Curacao licence. The scheme’s coverage and an operator’s licence are distinct facts. Treating one as a shortcut for the other risks confusing a self-exclusion boundary with a regulatory permission.

Attention: A casino’s apparent absence from GamStop does not prove that it holds a Curacao licence, nor does it establish that the operator is permitted to offer gambling to people in Great Britain.

This is why a list of Curacao casinos described as not on GamStop would not, by itself, tell you which operators are lawful for British customers or what protections apply. A site may use a licensing label, while the UK requirement remains tied to the operator’s activity in the British market. The name of a foreign licensing jurisdiction does not cancel that requirement.

There is also a difference between a casino being described as “not blocked” and the operator being entitled to provide online gambling in Great Britain. The first phrase concerns access or scheme participation; the second concerns legal authorisation. Neither should be used as a substitute for the other.

Keep the claims in separate columns

When you encounter claims about an online casino licensed in Curacao, keep the relevant questions apart:

A claim in one column does not fill in the others. In particular, a Curacao licence claim is not evidence of UKGC authorisation, and it does not establish whether a self-exclusion block applies.

For a British customer, the core comparison is therefore not “Curacao versus GamStop”. They are not competing licence options. The UKGC requirement addresses permission to offer remote gambling in the market; GamStop addresses self-exclusion across participating licensed operators. A foreign licence label cannot establish either British authorisation or a route around an existing exclusion.

Keep the distinction plain: stated foreign licence, UK permission, and GamStop coverage are separate matters. One label cannot do three jobs.

Recommended online casinos

1. Dieselwin
   Bonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
2. SlotoSport
   Bonus: 500% up to £ 10 200+ 777 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
3. x3bet
   Bonus: Welcome Pack 100% Up to £1.000 + 200 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
4. BeOnBet
   Bonus: 100% up to €500 + 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
5. Chanze
   Bonus: Slots Welcome Bonus #1 200% up to €500 · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
6. Amunbet
   Bonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
7. NightLuck
   Bonus: Welcome Pack + 805% Up To 6400€ + 280 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days

Checking a Casino Licence Without Assuming It Is Verified

A licence claim needs more than a badge on a casino’s homepage. To establish what the claim means, you would need to connect the operator to an identifiable licensing authority and confirm that the authority’s records support the claim. A licence number copied into a footer, terms page or promotional banner is not, on its own, independent confirmation.

That distinction matters when you are assessing a Curacao casino licence. Without a substantiated register and verification route to consult, a licence-check result cannot be presented as confirmed simply because a casino displays details or another page repeats them. Nor should a list of casinos described as Curacao-licensed be treated as a verified directory unless its entries can be checked against reliable records. A long list is not stronger evidence than a short one.

What a claim can establish

A casino’s own wording establishes that the casino makes a licensing claim. It does not, by itself, establish that the licence is current, that it belongs to the company operating the site, or that it covers the gambling service being offered. Those are separate questions, and they require evidence that connects the relevant details.

Be wary of treating a regulator’s name, a seal or a licence number as a complete answer. The useful test is whether you can independently trace the operator and the claim to an authoritative record. If that link cannot be made, the status remains unconfirmed. That is not proof that the claim is false; it is a reason not to present it as verified.

The same standard applies to third-party casino lists and review pages. Repetition can make a claim look established while leaving its underlying evidence unchanged. Check whether a page explains how it confirms licensing details and whether it provides a direct route to the relevant authority’s records. If it offers neither, regard the listing as an assertion, not a verification.

Keep the UK requirement in view

For a UK reader, a Curacao claim does not replace the UK requirement. Remote operators offering gambling to people in Great Britain must hold the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence, regardless of where the operator is based. A foreign licence claim alone does not demonstrate that requirement has been met.

To verify if an operator is authorised to serve the British market, consult the UK Gambling Commission’s register.

This is a separate check from confirming what a casino says about its Curacao status. Do not let one label stand in for the other, or infer that a site is authorised to serve British customers from a foreign licensing claim. The UK Gambling Commission’s register is the relevant place to check whether an operator holds a UK licence; that does not verify a separate Curacao claim.

A careful check may therefore end without a positive answer. If the operator’s identity, licence details and authority records cannot be connected, the responsible conclusion is that the claim has not been established. Avoid turning uncertainty into a recommendation, and do not treat an unverified Curacao casino list as a shortlist of confirmed operators.

For any casino you are considering, record what the operator claims and what an authoritative record independently confirms. If those do not match—or you cannot make the comparison—do not describe the licence as verified. A label is not a finding.

Safety Signals and Payment Rules to Check

For Curacao casino safety, judge the account controls you can see rather than relying on a reassuring badge or a payment logo. Look for tools to set deposit or other financial limits, a clear route to self-exclude, and accessible information about safer gambling. A visible control is useful only if its terms explain how it works and you can reach it before depositing.

UK rules place specific duties on UK-licensed operators. They must provide responsible-gambling tools, prompt new customers to set a financial limit before their first deposit, and make account-level limit controls accessible. They must also verify a customer’s age before allowing a deposit. These are requirements for UK-licensed casinos; their presence should not be assumed at a casino operating outside that system.

Payment restrictions matter too. Remote gambling operators in Britain cannot take credit-card payments for gambling, including credit-card funds routed through a money service business. A wallet cannot be used for gambling if it allows credit-card funds to pay for it. So a payment method’s name alone does not tell you whether a transaction is permitted: the funding route matters.

If you are considering Trustly or Paysafecard at a Curacao casino, treat acceptance as something to establish for that specific operator, not as a general feature of Curacao sites. Check the cashier and the operator’s payment terms before relying on either method. A logo or a mention on a third-party page is not proof that the method is currently available to you, or that every funding route is allowed.

Before you deposit, check whether the site explains how to set limits, find self-exclusion controls and contact support about account safeguards. If you have excluded yourself, do not open another account elsewhere to get around that decision. Gambling businesses have to take reasonable measures to stop excluded customers from gambling with them, but using a non-GamStop casino could still breach your own self-exclusion terms.

Safety Checks

• Check for tools to set deposit or financial limits
• Locate a clear route to self-exclude
• Find accessible information about safer gambling
• Confirm the funding route for payment methods
• Verify that the site explains how to contact support about safeguards

For UK-licensed online slots, autoplay is prohibited and each spin must last at least 2.5 seconds. Those rules are another point of comparison for UK-regulated play, not a feature to assume at a Curacao casino. If a site’s controls or payment conditions are unclear, pause before funding the account. Clear terms matter.

Not on GamStop: What Self-Exclusion Actually Covers

GamStop and self-exclusion from one gambling business do different jobs. GamStop is a multi-operator exclusion: while it applies, you cannot access your existing accounts or open new ones with the UK online gambling operators covered by the scheme. It is not a request to close only one account. The purpose is to prevent access across participating sites and apps, rather than leave you to contact each covered operator separately.

A separate self-exclusion applies to the venue or website you name when you make the request. If you exclude yourself from a particular gambling business, that business should refuse to serve you. The agreement is formal: you undertake not to gamble there, and you remain responsible for keeping to it. A site being described as a Curacao casino not on GamStop does not alter the terms of an exclusion you already accepted elsewhere.

The boundary is not a loophole

People looking for Curacao casinos not part of GamStop may be trying to understand which operators the scheme covers. But “not on GamStop” should not be treated as permission to resume gambling during an active exclusion. Moving to another account or a non-GamStop casino to get around an exclusion may breach the terms of your self-exclusion. It is not a safe workaround.

If you have chosen to exclude yourself, do not open another account elsewhere to continue gambling. The decision was made to put a barrier between you and gambling; finding another route around it defeats that protection. Self-exclusion is a commitment, not merely an account setting that applies only when convenient.

The same principle matters if you excluded yourself from one business rather than registering with GamStop. That individual agreement concerns the business you selected. It does not become irrelevant because another site uses different branding, serves a different market or is described as offshore. If you are unsure what you agreed to, contact the business or scheme through its official channel rather than testing the boundary with a deposit.

Check what you excluded yourself from

Before taking any action, identify the scope of your own exclusion. Did you register with GamStop, contact one online casino, or exclude yourself from a physical venue? These are not interchangeable arrangements. A request to one gambling company concerns that company; a GamStop registration is intended to apply across the covered online operators. Neither should be interpreted as an invitation to find an unexcluded place to gamble.

You may also be tempted in more than one setting: online, in betting shops, at casinos or elsewhere. Exclude yourself from all places where you may be tempted, rather than relying on a single barrier to cover every situation. Gambling businesses must offer self-exclusion, but the arrangement still depends on the scope of the request you make. A search for Curacao casinos and Paysafecard, for instance, tells you nothing about whether a particular operator is within your exclusion or whether using it would conflict with your agreement.

Exclusion Breach

Opening another account or using a non-GamStop casino to get around an active self-exclusion may breach the terms of your commitment.

If you have self-excluded, treat an unfamiliar site’s claim about its status as separate from your own commitment. A label such as “not on GamStop” does not confirm that playing there is consistent with the terms you accepted. It also does not prove anything about the site’s licensing or safeguards. Keep those issues distinct.

If you have already gambled

If you have spent money while excluded, do not assume that the regulator can return it. The regulator cannot provide refunds for money spent gambling. Nor does opening another account undo the exclusion or settle whether you have breached its terms. Stop, avoid further deposits, and contact the relevant business or scheme for clarification.

A self-exclusion works best when treated as a firm boundary across the places where you might gamble. GamStop can block access to covered UK online accounts, while an individual request can exclude you from a particular business. Neither makes another site a recommended alternative. If the urge to keep gambling is driving the search, do not use that search to find a way around the agreement. Keep the barrier in place.

Neteller and Skrill: Check the Rules Before You Deposit

A casino’s name beside Neteller or Skrill in a payment search result is not proof that either service can be used there. Payment options can differ between operators, and a logo or mention may not tell you whether the method is available to you at registration, for deposits, or for withdrawals.

For Curacao casinos in particular, do not treat Neteller or Skrill acceptance as established unless the operator’s own current cashier and terms confirm it.

Check the exact operator rather than relying on a general claim about Curacao casinos. Look in the cashier after creating an account only if you are comfortable doing so, and read the payment terms before sending money. Confirm whether the method is offered for the transaction you intend to make, whether the account name must match, and whether the operator sets conditions for withdrawals. If those points are unclear, ask the casino’s customer service for a written answer before depositing. A payment brand mentioned in promotional material does not settle the terms.

Keep Neteller and Skrill separate in your comparison. Acceptance of one would not establish acceptance of the other, and neither should be treated as a standard feature of Curacao casinos. Record what the specific operator says, where it says it, and whether the cashier agrees. If the details conflict, do not assume the more favourable version applies.

The payment route also does not tell you whether a casino is suitable or whether its claims are reliable. A familiar e-wallet name can make a site seem more established than its terms justify. Convenient-looking branding is not confirmation.

If you cannot verify the method and its conditions before depositing, treat it as unavailable for your decision. That may rule out an operator if using Neteller or Skrill is essential to you; if it is not essential, compare only the payment arrangements the casino clearly confirms. No guesswork needed.

Verifying Payments

Check the Cashier

Review the actual cashier after creating an account to see if the payment method is available for your specific transaction.

Read the Terms

Review the operator’s payment terms to identify conditions for deposits and withdrawals.

Contact Support

Ask customer service for a written answer if any details are unclear or conflict.

Crypto Casinos: Treat Availability as Unverified

A cryptocurrency label does not establish that a casino accepts crypto deposits, supports a particular coin or permits withdrawals through the same route. Those details are operator-specific. Treat claims about them as unconfirmed until the operator’s own payment terms clearly describe what is accepted and how transactions work.

The same distinction applies to a Curacao connection. A casino’s use of crypto does not establish where it is licensed, or whether it is authorised to serve customers in Great Britain. Remote gambling operators offering services to Great Britain consumers must hold the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence, regardless of where they are based. Payment technology does not alter that requirement.

If you are comparing crypto casinos, the useful test is not simply whether a site displays a digital-currency logo. Look for consistent terms covering deposits, withdrawals, transaction fees, exchange rates and what happens if a payment is delayed or rejected. Do not assume that a deposit method is available because a general payment page mentions it; the account’s actual terms should identify the method and any conditions that apply.

A crypto casino Curacao search should therefore be treated as a topic, not evidence that a named operator, currency or payment route is available to you. Nor does a crypto option make a casino outside the UK regulatory system equivalent to a UK-licensed site. The payment method may be prominent; the relevant authorisation still matters more.

Do not deposit on the strength of a banner or a broad claim. If the operator’s terms do not explain the route plainly, you cannot make a reliable comparison on payment availability. That is not a minor detail.

New Curacao Casinos: No Verified Launches to List

“New” is a date claim, not a quality rating. To call a Curacao casino new in 2026, you would need reliable evidence that the operator began offering casino services that year. A fresh website design, a new brand name or a listing on a recently updated page does not establish when the casino launched.

Non-UK-Regulated Casinos: Licences and Risks

That is not a useful shortcut when you are deciding where to deposit.

The date also says nothing on its own about whether a casino is suitable for people in Great Britain. Remote gambling operators selling into the British market must hold a UK Gambling Commission licence, regardless of where they are based. “New” and “licensed for the British market” are separate claims; one does not prove the other.

If you encounter a casino described as newly launched, look for a dated announcement from the operator and check that it refers to the casino’s actual start of service, rather than a rebrand or a new website. Treat the description as unconfirmed if the date cannot be tied to clear evidence. A precise launch claim should be traceable, not merely repeated.

That is a limit on what can be stated, not an endorsement of any site using the label. A date alone would not settle the more important question of whether an operator may legally serve you in Great Britain.

How to Self-Exclude—and What Happens Next

To register with GamStop, identify the online gambling accounts you want the exclusion to cover, provide the personal information needed to confirm your identity, choose an exclusion duration and wait for confirmation. Check the details carefully before submitting: the identity check is part of the process.

If you later decide to end your GamStop exclusion, you must contact GamStop directly. Identity verification comes first. Once it is complete, a fixed 24-hour cooling-off period begins, and your exclusion remains active throughout. There is no faster removal option. You can cancel the request during that period by contacting GamStop and asking to keep the exclusion in place.

After GamStop processes a removal, operators may need additional time to update your status. Until they do, access may remain blocked.

Responsible Gambling

Content created by the Tenobet team.